Bridging Sustainability, Experiential Learning, and Youth Leadership

A Global Research and Innovation Model (GYLRIM)

Authors

  • Ken Wang -President SMA

Abstract

This study proposes the Global Youth Leadership Research and Innovation Model (GYLRIM) as an
integrated framework for advancing youth leadership within sustainability-oriented contexts. Addressing
the growing need for interdisciplinary approaches, the study bridges experiential learning, cross-sector
collaboration, and community engagement to connect education with real-world sustainability challenges.
Drawing upon experiential learning theory and sustainability-oriented development, the research
develops a structured model consisting of input, process, and output layers. The model is applied
through field-based practices that incorporate service learning and community participation. Data were
collected through qualitative approaches, including observations, interviews, and document analysis, to
examine how experiential learning environments contribute to leadership development and innovation.
The findings indicate that experiential and service-based learning significantly enhance youth leadership
capacity, critical thinking, and social responsibility. In addition, cross-sector collaboration among
educational institutions, communities, and public actors plays a crucial role in facilitating sustainable
outcomes. The GYLRIM model demonstrates how the integration of educational resources, cultural assets, and policy support can generate long-term impacts on both individual development and
community sustainability.
2
This study contributes to the literature by offering a novel interdisciplinary framework that links education,
sustainability, and youth empowerment. It also provides practical implications for policymakers,
educators, and practitioners seeking to implement collaborative and sustainability-oriented development
strategies. The model aligns with global sustainability agendas and offers a scalable approach applicable
across diverse socio-cultural contexts. 

References

Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability.

Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421.

Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross‐sector

collaborations. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663.

Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass.

Hall, C. M. (2019). Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial

ecology of sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(7), 1044–1060.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice

Hall.

Tosun, C. (2006). Expected nature of community participation in tourism development. Tourism

Management, 27(3), 493–504.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO

Publishing.

UNWTO. (2020). International Tourism Highlights. World Tourism Organization.

Scheyvens, R. (2011). Tourism and poverty. Routledge.

Dredge, D., & Jamal, T. (2015). Progress in tourism planning and policy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,

(3), 349–353.

Richards, G. (2018). Cultural tourism: A review

OECD. (2018). Tourism trends and policies. OECD Publishing.

UNDP. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations.

Wearing, S., & McDonald, M. (2002). The development of community-based tourism. Tourism

Management, 23(5), 475–479.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Wang, K. (2026). Bridging Sustainability, Experiential Learning, and Youth Leadership: A Global Research and Innovation Model (GYLRIM). ESG Frontier, 1(1). retrieved from https://so17.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ESGF/article/view/1-13