A Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Social Impact of SDG Bootcamps
Integrating Causal Pathways, SROI, and System Dynamics
Keywords:
SDG Bootcamp; Social Impact Assessment; Sustainability Education; ESG Education; Social Return on Investment (SROI); Theory of Change; SDG Evaluation FrameworkAbstract
This study develops a conceptual framework for assessing the social impact of Sustainability
Development Goals (SDG) bootcamps, addressing the lack of structured and theory-driven evaluation
models in sustainability-oriented experiential education. While SDG bootcamps are widely adopted as
innovative learning platforms, existing research has primarily focused on descriptive outcomes, with
limited attention to the underlying mechanisms and systemic dynamics of impact generation.
To bridge this gap, this study proposes the SDG Bootcamp Social Impact Assessment (SDG-BSIA)
framework, which integrates three complementary theoretical perspectives: causal pathway modeling,
Social Return on Investment (SROI)-based value logic, and system dynamics. The framework
conceptualizes social impact as a multi-level and evolving process, beginning with individual learning
and competency development, extending to behavioral change and community-level outcomes, and
ultimately contributing to broader sustainability transformation.
The causal pathway model explicates the mechanisms through which experiential learning translates into
societal impact, while the SROI-based value logic captures the multi-dimensional nature of value
creation, including social, environmental, and educational dimensions. Furthermore, the system loop
perspective highlights the recursive and adaptive nature of impact, emphasizing feedback loops and the
role of stakeholder interactions within a broader impact ecosystem.
2
As a conceptual study, this research contributes to the literature by advancing a structured, integrative,
and theory-driven approach to understanding social impact in sustainability education. It shifts the
analytical focus from static outcome measurement to dynamic impact processes and systemic
transformation. The proposed framework also provides practical implications for educators, program
designers, and policymakers in designing and evaluating SDG-related initiatives.
Future research is encouraged to empirically validate the framework across diverse contexts and to
explore the integration of data-driven and ESG-oriented evaluation approaches to enhance the
robustness and applicability of social impact assessment in sustainability education.
References
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to
education. University of Chicago Press.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1986). Social impact assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 451–478.
Vanclay, F. (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project
Appraisal, 21(1), 5–11.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN.
UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO
Publishing.
Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert, E., & Goodspeed, T. (2012). A guide to social return on investment.
Cabinet Office (UK).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ESG Frontier

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the x may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
other reuse or republication requires permission from the journal."