ACCEPTANCE OF INNOVATION AND ATTITUDE TOWARDS CONSUMERS’ DECISION TO PURCHASE ELECTRIC CARS IN QINHUANGDAO CITY, THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Authors

  • Nicknipar Boonchouy -

Keywords:

Acceptance, Attitudes, Decision to Purchase, Electric Cars

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: (1) to study the relationship between innovation acceptance and electric vehicle purchase decision; and (2) to study the relationship between attitude and electric vehicle purchase decision. This research methodology was quantitative research. The population was the consumers of Qinhuangdao city. Who have experience or have made the decision to purchase an electric car but the exact number cannot be known. Therefore, the research sample was calculated using Cochran's formula, numbering 400 people, using convenience sampling. Using a questionnaire as a tool to collect data. Statistics used in the analysis include frequency, percentage, standard deviation and statistics of the pearson correlation coefficient.

The research findings were found that: (1) acceptance of cognitive innovations was related to the decision to purchase electric cars with statistical significance at the 0.01 level. As for the acceptance of innovation in the area of interest the evaluation aspect, the experimentation aspect, and the acceptance aspect were not related to the decision to purchase an electric vehicle; and (2) the cognitive attitude emotional side and the behavioral aspect is related to every aspect of the decision to purchase electric cars with statistical significance at the 0.01 level.

References

Ambak, K.; et al. (2016). Driver Intention to Use Electric Cars Using Technology Acceptance Model. Smart Driving Research Centre, UniversitiTun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

Barnett, H. G. (1953). Innovation: The basis of culture change. New York: MC Graw-Hill.

Carter Good. (1959). Promotion and Intergraded Marking Communications. Ohio : South-Western.

Belch, G.E., and Belch, M.A. (2004). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated. Marketing Communications Perspective. 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation a Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. The Academy of management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Duncan, T. R. (2002). IMC: Using Advertising and Promotion to Build Brands. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Emsenhuber, E.-M. (2012). Determinants of the acceptance of electric vehicles (Master's thesis). Department of Business Administration. Aarhus University.

Foley, B.; et al. (2020). Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Uptake: Insights from a Descriptive Analysis in Australia. Urban Sci. 2020, 4,https://doi.org/10.3390/urbans ci4040057.

Godes et al. (2005). The Firm’s Management of Social Interactions. Marketing Letters, 16(3), 415–428.

Gordon Allport. (1975). The Nature of Prejudice 25th Anniversary Edition. New York : Ingram Publisher Services.

Harkema, S. (2003). A Complex Adaptive Perspective on Learning within Innovation Projects. The Learning Organization, 10(6), 340-346.

Howard; and Kendler. (1963). Psychology : A Science in Conflict. Boston: Mc Graw Hill.

Jabeen, F.; et al. (2012). Acceptability of electric Vehicles: Findings from a Driver Survey. School of Electrical and Computer engineering, University of Western Australia.

Jenn, A.; Springel, K.; & Gopal, A. R. (2018). Effectiveness of electric vehicle incentives in the United States.

Energy Policy. 119: 349-356.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

1.
Boonchouy N. ACCEPTANCE OF INNOVATION AND ATTITUDE TOWARDS CONSUMERS’ DECISION TO PURCHASE ELECTRIC CARS IN QINHUANGDAO CITY, THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. J. Innov. Sustain. Bus. Manag. [internet]. 2025 May 14 [cited 2025 May 24];1(1):22-35. available from: https://so17.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JISBM/article/view/621