Developing Learning Achievement and Analytical Thinking Skills in Science on the Topic of Separation of Substances among Grade 8 Students through Experimental-Based Learning Activities
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) compare students’ learning achievement before and after instruction 2) compare students’ post-instruction learning achievement with the established criterion as 80%; and 3) compare students’ analytical thinking skills after instruction. The study was conducted with Grade 8 students enrolled in Science course on the topic of Separation of Substances, using experimental-based learning activities. The target group consisted of 38 students from class 2/2 in the first semester of the 2025 academic year at Wachiraprakran Witthayakhom School under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office Kamphaeng Phet. The research instruments included: 1) Five experimental-based lesson plans totaling 10 instructional hours 2) The 20-item four-choice multiple-choice test measuring learning achievement on the topic of Separation of Substances and 3) The 15-item four-choice multiple-choice test assessing analytical thinking skills. The findings revealed that the implementation of experimental-based learning activities in Science on the topic of Separation of Substances significantly improved students’ learning achievement after instruction compared to before instruction at the .05 level of statistical significance. In addition, students’ post-instruction learning achievement was significantly higher than the established 80% criterion at the .05 level. Furthermore, students’ analytical thinking skills after instruction were significantly higher than those before instruction at the .05 level of statistical significance.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Faculty of Education Journal Uttaradit Rajabhat University It is a medium for disseminating research results. Academic work Any opinions expressed in the article are solely the personal opinions of the author. Faculty of Education Uttaradit Rajabhat University and the editorial team does not necessarily have opinions that are consistent with those expressed in the article in any way. and is not considered the responsibility of the Faculty of Education Uttaradit Rajabhat University and editorial team
References
บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2556). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 9). กรุงเทพฯ: สุวีริยาสาส์น.
ภพ เลาหไพบูลย์. (2542). แนวการสอนวิทยาศาสตร์ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 3). กรุงเทพฯ: ไทยวัฒนาพาณิชย์.
สถาบันทดสอบทางการศึกษาแห่งชาติ (องค์การมหาชน). (2568). รายงานผลการทดสอบทางการศึกษาแห่งชาติขั้นพื้นฐาน (O-NET) ชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 3 ปีการศึกษา 2567. http://www.niets.or.th
Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in sciences course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104
Ariza, J. A. (2024). Bringing active learning, experimentation, and student-created videos in engineering: A study about teaching electronics and physical computing integrating online and mobile learning. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2023, 31, 1723-1749.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22673
Antonio, R. P., & Prudente, M. S. (2024). Effects of inquiry-based approaches on students’ higher-order thinking skills in science: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(1), 251-281. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3216
Beck, K., Witteck, T., & Eilks, I. (2010). Open experimentation on phenomena of chemical reactions via the Learning Company Approach in early secondary chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75237
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.
Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2020). Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00240-5
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Michael, W. B., & Coffman, W. E. (1956). Book Reviews : Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, by Benjamin S. Bloom (ed.). New York: Longmans, Green and Company, I956. 207 pp. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16(3), 401-405.
Paul, J., Lederman, N. G., & Groß, J. (2016). Learning experimentation through science fairs. International Journal of Science Education, 38(15), 1-21.
Pimvichai, J., Yuenyong, C., & Buaraphan, K. (2019). Development of Grade 10 Students’ Scientific Argumentation through the Science-Technology-Society Learning Unit on Work and Energy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.527
Tekin, G., & Muştu, O. E. (2021). The effect of research-inquiry based activities on the academic achievement, attitudes, and scientific process skills of students in the seventh year science course. The European Educational Researcher, 4(1), 109-131.
https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.416
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en.