Publication Ethics
According to the Journal of Public and Private Issues: JPPI has been prepared to publish research articles and academic articles in the group of social sciences. In order to disseminate correctly, with quality, transparency and in accordance with internationally accepted publication quality standards, the Journal of Public and Private Issues: JPPI therefore requires all parties involved to strictly comply with the principles and standards of ethical publication as follows:
Duties of authors
1. The article submission must be certified by the author as a new work that has never been presented in a proceeding form and has been published elsewhere.
2. The article submitted for publication must present a true report of the research results without misrepresentation or misrepresentation.
3. If someone else's work is used in the author's work, the author's work must be referenced and appear in the reference list at the end of the article.
4. Articles submitted for publication must comply with the format specified in the recommendation of the journal's original thesis submission, otherwise the editors will not be considered for such articles.
5. The article whose author's name appears must be the person who took part in the actual research and the editorial team will consider the feasibility of the article.
6. The article must include the source of funding supporting this research in the acknowledgment.
7. The authors must specify conflicts of interest (if any).
Duties of editors
1. Journal editors are responsible for reviewing the format, completeness, and quality of articles before starting a qualified evaluation process for publication in the journal they are responsible for.
2. The editor will not disclose any information during the article evaluation period and the publication of that journal to any person unrelated, whether it is the author's information or the article's reviewer.
3. Editors will be the preliminary assessors in the decision to select articles for the publishing process and consider publishing articles that have passed the article evaluation process based on the evaluation results of experts based on importance, recency, clarity and consistency. of the content and the policy of the journal are important.
4. Editors will not publish articles that have been published elsewhere either in the form of journals or articles after their presentation at a full academic conference (Proceeding).
5. Editors will not reject the publication of articles that do not meet the requirements until there is evidence to prove those suspicions.
6. The editors will not have any conflicts of interest with the authors, the evaluators and the management team.
7. Editors will check Plagiarism in articles using credible programs and if there is clear evidence or confirmation of plagiarism of others' work, the editors will contact the main author for clarification and if there is no editorial clarification. will refuse to publish that article.
Duties of reviewers
1. The article reviewer will not disclose information about the article and author but other unrelated persons throughout the evaluation period (Confidentiality).
2. The article evaluator must not have conflicts of interest with the author, such as being a co-author or others that will prevent the evaluator from assessing and giving recommendations independently.
3. Article assessors will evaluate articles in their field of expertise, consider the content of the articles and assess the articles, considering the importance, recency, clarity, and consistency of the content without using uninformed personal opinions. The academic support came as a criterion for judging articles.
4. The assessor can suggest important research findings and corresponding to the article in case the author does not refer to the article evaluation.
5. If the assessor finds that an article is similar or duplicates the work of others with clear evidence, the assessor can reject the publication and notify the editor.
