The KI-DEAL framework: An integrated approach to public sector innovation and knowledge management for local government development in the digital era

Authors

  • Pajaree Suriyachaiwat Nowong Law Program, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat

Keywords:

public sector innovation, knowledge management, learning organization, local government

Abstract

This academic article presents an integrated conceptual framework between public sector innovation and knowledge management to drive the development of Thai public organizations in the digital era. The study aims to (1) analyze the theoretical relationship between public sector innovation and knowledge management, (2) synthesize an integrated framework suitable for Thai local government contexts, (3) propose practical implementation approaches, and (4) identify success factors and barriers. The study employs critical document analysis and conceptual synthesis from international literature and Thai contexts. The findings reveal that public sector innovation and knowledge management are inextricably linked, with knowledge management serving as a critical foundation for creating innovation, while innovation is the outcome of creative knowledge utilization. The article proposes the "KI-DEAL Framework" (Knowledge Innovation - Digital Era Adaptive Learning), which comprises six key dimensions: (1) Knowledge Creation and Acquisition, (2) Knowledge Storage and Access, (3) Knowledge Sharing and Transfer, (4) Knowledge Application for Innovation, (5) Organizational Learning Culture, and (6) Digital Technology as Enabler. Critical success factors include leadership commitment, resource support, digital infrastructure, and appropriate incentive systems. Major barriers encompass bureaucratic structures, silo-based work culture, limited digital skills, and resistance to change. This article has significant implications for both theory and practice in enhancing the efficiency and innovation of Thai public sector organizations.

References

กรมส่งเสริมการปกครองท้องถิ่น. (2565). รายงานผลการดำเนินงานประจำปีพ.ศ.2565(ภารกิจสำคัญ). กระทรวงมหาดไทย. http://www.ppb.moi.go.th/midev01/upload/moimissionreport65.pdf.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.(2561). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ 20 ปี (พ.ศ. 2561-2580). สำนักนายกรัฐมนตรี. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2561/A/082/T_0001.PDF.

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961.

Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation—From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008.

Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.

Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681-1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004.

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109-116.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136

Massaro, M., Secinaro, S., Dal Mas, F., Brescia, V., & Calandra, D. (2020). Industry 4.0 and circular economy: An exploratory analysis of academic and practitioners' perspectives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1213-1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2680.

Mention, A. L. (2012). Intellectual capital, innovation and performance: A systematic review of the literature. Business and Economic Research, 2(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v2i1.1937.

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2019). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en

Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.

Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public service

organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00257.

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.

Wiig, K. M. (2002). Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210434331.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Suriyachaiwat Nowong, P. (2026). The KI-DEAL framework: An integrated approach to public sector innovation and knowledge management for local government development in the digital era. Modern Public Administrative Science, 3(2), 255–268. retrieved from https://so17.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jppi/article/view/1733

Issue

Section

Research Articles